tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post7642258251035713726..comments2024-03-22T15:55:34.030-04:00Comments on Evo and Proud: Can antiracism reform itself?Peter Frosthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04303172060029254340noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-64678896887625046802014-04-08T00:42:13.881-04:002014-04-08T00:42:13.881-04:00I am really enjoying reading your well written art...I am really enjoying reading your well written articles. It looks like you spend a lot of effort and time on your blog. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. <a href="http://ibcbet.pbsbo.com/" rel="nofollow">Agen Ibcbet Online</a>Sbobet Casino Onlinehttp://sbobet.pbsbo.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-72222967798490833642013-06-01T15:01:58.268-04:002013-06-01T15:01:58.268-04:00uh, i'd still buy that alternate history novel...uh, i'd still buy that alternate history novel, dude. cheers!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-51020971562750097152013-05-30T19:28:53.606-04:002013-05-30T19:28:53.606-04:00Anon,
Globalization isn't speculation. It'...Anon,<br /><br />Globalization isn't speculation. It's real and it's happening. And it's the force that is driving the massive demographic change that daybreaker and others are concerned about.<br /><br />Insourcing of low-wage labor brings real monetary benefits. Why do you think so many business interests are pushing so hard for it? Look at all the briefs that have been submitted in favor of "immigration reform" (i.e., amnesty plus higher legal immigration levels). Most of them come from the usual gamut of business interests. And it's not just big business. It's also small business too: landscapers, restaurant owners, Christmas tree farmers, etc.<br /><br />This is a problem that is inherent to our current economic system. We would have it even if we were all Eskimos or Marsh Arabs.<br /><br />As for my "alternate history", you can reject it as mere speculation. Fine. But what's happening now is hardly speculative.Peter Fros_noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-70674257480873276142013-05-30T18:38:40.742-04:002013-05-30T18:38:40.742-04:00panjoomby,
You don't have to wait for Peter t...panjoomby,<br /><br />You don't have to wait for Peter to write that novel. It's just warmed-over Marxist materialism. There are thousands, millions of tomes and pages that have been written about it already over the past century. Peter has a tendency to turn to it when things start getting a little too politically incorrect. At that point, apparently things like genes, biology, sociobiology, etc., stop mattering and the economic or material "substructure" explains everything.<br /><br />Peter,<br /><br />You are speculating, and the entire premise of your speculation - that it represents some sort of "Jew-free" hypothetical - is not even true.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-84909673691300773152013-05-30T13:07:06.578-04:002013-05-30T13:07:06.578-04:00@Peter Fros_
that is a superbly well-reasoned &...@Peter Fros_<br />that is a superbly well-reasoned & succinct alternate history. my highest kudos - if you wrote such an alternate history novel i'd buy it. (as in purchase it & as in believe it) well-said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-63145879603382112932013-05-29T13:35:00.054-04:002013-05-29T13:35:00.054-04:00Anon,
Let's suppose that most Jews had remain...Anon,<br /><br />Let's suppose that most Jews had remained in the Pale of Settlement and that they likewise remained marginal in the Western World. How different would history have been?<br /><br />Well, there would have been no Hitler and no Second World War. And without WWII, decolonization would have proceeded much more slowly.<br /><br />In this alternate scenario, the British and French would have consolidated their empires by raising their colonies to the status of overseas provinces and by granting citizenship to their colonial subjects. I'm not speculating here. That's what they were planning to do both before and immediately after WWII. Those plans came to nought only because of the wave of decolonization that set in from the mid-1950s onward.<br /><br />In this alternate world, we would have more globalism, not less. And the economic logic of globalization would still be with us. It's not because Mark Zuckerberg is Jewish that he's lobbying for more immigration of computer programmers from India. He just wants to cut labor costs. And the same goes for all of the agribusiness interests, landscapers, home builders, and so on who are clamoring for "guest workers."<br /><br />It's not hard to understand. If you frame globalization as the problem, the resulting policy solutions will be framed accordingly. If you frame the problem as the "Jews" or "Jihadists" you'll get policies that fail to address the problem or make it even worse. Peter Fros_noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-84947915458636795452013-05-29T13:05:30.257-04:002013-05-29T13:05:30.257-04:00Peter,
"Antisemitism" and "anti-ji...Peter,<br /><br />"Antisemitism" and "anti-jihadism" are terms like "racism". They're political terms used opportunistically.<br /><br />Any genuinely nationalist party or movement worth its salt will be considered "antisemitic", "anti-jihadist", "racist", etc. Anything else is just an ineffectual lightning rod for native discontent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-82385204767987042562013-05-29T08:09:07.317-04:002013-05-29T08:09:07.317-04:00Daybreaker,
I understand your grief over the demo...Daybreaker,<br /><br />I understand your grief over the demographic changes that are sweeping through Australia and other Western countries. But you're not going to change things by feeling upset and leaving tons of comments on my blog.<br /><br />Why don't you contact Mark Richardson and ask him what sort of real-world action you can do?<br /><br />Antisemitism is a trap. As is "anti-jihadism". The nationalist parties that have made the most progress are those that have avoided both of those traps. This is one reason why there is no real resistance to globalism in the U.S.Peter Fros_noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-61958323813842426892013-05-29T01:08:06.688-04:002013-05-29T01:08:06.688-04:00"The solution, however, is not to abandon ant..."The solution, however, is not to abandon antiracism, but to reform it."<br /><br />Anti-racist means anti-white.<br /><br />So try the sentence with this substitution: "The solution, however, is not to abandon anti-white-ism, but to reform it."<br /><br />Or: "The solution, however, is not to abandon anti-white race hatred enacted in policy, but to reform it."<br /><br />Or: "The solution, however, is not to discontinue white genocide, but to reform it."<br /><br />"Reform" that consists of reluctant minor actions against the more blatant and crude forms of anti-white hostility <i>while maintaining policies of white genocide</i> is a smoother way to pursue genocide.<br /><br />The proper response to genocide is to stop it. The proper response to anti-white-ism is to repudiate it and dismantle it.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-24524419585635862892013-05-29T00:01:48.137-04:002013-05-29T00:01:48.137-04:00Sean, you are spending a lot of time tendentiously...Sean, you are spending a lot of time tendentiously pushing the idea that Jews, who are so influential in many areas, have had no influence on anti-white policies, but this is irrelevant because <i>what defines the anti-whites is what they do</i>. There are whites, with the detestable Tom Hayden as a prime example, who explicitly desire the destruction of the white race and work to that end. There are Jews with the same attitude, and of course much better networking. The crime of genocide is the same, whether you are white, black, yellow, red, brown, Jewish or non-Jewish, or for that matter right or left-handed. It is a matter of ending a racial, ethnic, religious or national group by policy, and not of your motives.<br /><br />As for the notion that we always act on irrational feelings, never on explicit processing (that is your "abstract conscious deliberation"), this also is an invalid defense to the crime of genocide. It does not hold up in law or morality.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-26732114927921069842013-05-28T17:34:11.530-04:002013-05-28T17:34:11.530-04:00Anon, Spectre is naive if she really believes her ...Anon, Spectre is naive if she really believes her people are the bearers of multiculturalism. They didn't invent the Enlightenment project of a universal civilization, the French did. And to further it they insisted Jews integrate, hence Zionism which was declared 'a form of racism and racial discrimination' according to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379. I've already mentioned the connection between the French mainstream intellectuals critiquing anti-racism and the way anti-racists are also anti-Zionism. Sweden is most pro-immigration country in Europe, but it was like that before Barbara Lerner Spectre got there. Re. "busy making casseroles and conforming to what they're told". Have you heard of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Wright" rel="nofollow">Frances Wright</a> and her interracial free love commune? Her ideas came from France<br />---------------------------<br /><br />I said: "I wonder if reading faces (and related social insights) are attenuated in populations selected for a hard-wired VWF" <a href="http://evoandproud.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/the-visual-word-form-area-part-ii.html?showComment=1361037130742#c6363394097360929804" rel="nofollow">here</a><br /><br /><a href="http://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/face-blindness/#comments" rel="nofollow">Face Blindness</a> "2.5% of people in Germany had a hereditary, congenital form of prosopagnosia (face blindness)." <br /><br />I'm sure it's just a coincidence that Germany was the first country to have universal literacy.Seannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-19160263015708562092013-05-28T16:46:06.974-04:002013-05-28T16:46:06.974-04:00Someone should have told Joe Biden to mention chur...Someone should have told Joe Biden to mention church ladies in his recent speech. Apparently, in between baking casseroles and jello salads, church ladies have been moonlighting as Hollywood producers and media moguls.<br /><br />http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/biden-jewish-heritage-is-american-heritage-164525.html<br /><br />"“The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has had such an outsized influence per capita as all of you standing before you, and all of those who went before me and all of those who went before you.”"<br /><br />"“The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements.<br /><br />“You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people.”<br /><br />“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a little ahead of time.”<br /><br />“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage, Biden said.<br /><br />“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said.<br /><br />Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. “You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of … rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”<br /><br />“Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us, us, me – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that’s a fact,” he said."<br /><br />"“So I think you, as usual, underestimate the impact of Jewish heritage. I really mean that. I think you vastly underestimate the impact you’ve had on the development of this nation. We owe you, we owe generations who came before you,” he said.""Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-38821239069614889732013-05-28T16:28:39.389-04:002013-05-28T16:28:39.389-04:00Yeah, Peter, I know plenty of church ladies myself...Yeah, Peter, I know plenty of church ladies myself. They're naive airheads who do and think what they're told. They're not globe trotting activists or media personalities like Spectre and Sontag who go around posing as authority figures telling people what to think. Church ladies are busy making casseroles and conforming to what they're told.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-54767845064091518722013-05-28T13:56:10.060-04:002013-05-28T13:56:10.060-04:00As have been telling you for the last week: we all...As have been telling you for the last week: we all use feelings (attuned to particular community's standards), <i>not</i> abstract conscious deliberation. Harping on about 'genocide' and Sontag & co is seriously counter productive, whatever you may think.Seannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-15700302068340648282013-05-28T12:50:13.577-04:002013-05-28T12:50:13.577-04:00Sean: "It seems to me whites wouldn't fee...Sean: "It seems to me whites wouldn't feel obliged to sacrifice for those white people who have not been born yet, even if they believed all your predictions."<br /><br />Fighting for one's posterity is ancient, a foundation of civilization, and the finest thing a human can do. The very best of us will even sacrifice their healthy, happy, intellectually productive and successful lives for a small chance to change the future for the better for the benefit of their descendants. That courage should give us hope.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-12742013701297549682013-05-28T12:43:50.372-04:002013-05-28T12:43:50.372-04:00Sean: "So everyone in the west is guilty of g...Sean: "So everyone in the west is guilty of genocide against non whites by your reasoning."<br /><br />No.<br /><br />Here is how this works. Asian for the Asians, Africa for the blacks, white countries for everybody. All blacks retain their black countries; the future of their race is secure. All Asians retain their Asian countries; the future of their race is secure. The whites are wiped out.<br /><br />The obligation to prevent genocide naturally falls most heavily on whites, who are the nearest to the crime, geographically, in blood, and in some cases as active agents who ought to repent.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-17065971801699453812013-05-28T12:33:29.815-04:002013-05-28T12:33:29.815-04:00What happens if you move millions of European dogs...What happens if you move millions of European dogs into all dingo habitat, and prevent any segregation of the dingoes, and favor the dogs in every way you can? What is the future of the dingoes in that case? It's obvious there isn't one; you are driving them into extinction. Ecologically conscious anti-whites get upset about things like that, but when it comes to whites, a population they are actually part of, they will pretend not to see the problem.<br /><br />What happens if an Indian tribe is living on its reservation, and you imports a million blacks from Africa, and settle them in the reservation and require the Indians to "integrate" and "assimilate"? What is the future of the tribe in that case? It's obvious there isn't one; you are genociding them. Anti-whites concerned with the rights of indigenous peoples and social justice will get upset about things like that (as they should), but when it comes to whites, a population they are actually part of, they will pretend not to see the problem. Are the Welsh, for instance, the native inhabitants of Wales? No, no, the anti-whites can't see a problem.<br /><br />The difficulty is not the logic of opposing genocide, and the moral and legal obligation to oppose genocide. That is bullet-proof. There is also no problem with getting people to see the logic of mass immigration and forced integration as an extinction event. People see that well enough when their anti-white racial bias is not engaged. The problem is anti-white bias, promoted by a hostile academia, mass media and political establishment.<br /><br />Propaganda and fear of speaking politically incorrect truths keep people silent for now. And there is good reason for that silent fear, as Jason Richwine discovered.<br /><br />But there is a duty of care where genocide is concerned. That duty exist regardless of who is swayed by what propaganda today. And it is naturally stronger in common morality the closer the crime is.<br /><br />Basically you are predicting that anti-white propaganda will always have a dominating effect, so that those concerned with the future of white people might as well give up, regardless of true justice, the obligation to oppose genocides, the claims of race and nation, and anything else a historian and an intellectual might come up with.<br /><br />But this is only the same kind of bluster that Communism used: give up, the triumph of our system is foreordained by Karl Marx! And you don't even have a Karl Marx; there is no developed rationale why the bad guys are going to win perpetually. Genocidal anti-whites are winning <i>for now</i>, and that is all they have.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-38640618270460693232013-05-28T11:17:54.830-04:002013-05-28T11:17:54.830-04:00Daybreaker, your arguments are not correct ones ta...Daybreaker, your arguments are not correct ones taken to extremes, they are just wrong. The analogy with a child dying in circumstances where it is within an adult's power to rescue the child at no danger to themselves assumes there is a categorical duty to help. If one was in those circumstances, then yes we would be obliged to help, just as we would have a right to expect other adults to help our own child. But, a continent away children are certainly dying in Africa right now of hunger and or diseases that could easily be prevented. And there are affluent liberals, of the Tom Hayden type, who are spending money on fripperies such as parties for their children, which would save the lives of one or more black children. (It sounds callous even saying that.) Though western liberal universalists will give to those desperately in need in other countries, they do not feel obliged to give so much that their own children will be even slightly disadvantaged. So everyone in the west is guilty of genocide against non whites by your reasoning.<br /><br /><i>Nobody</i> acts in accordance with that reasoning, except in speculative <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development#Post-Conventional" rel="nofollow">theories of moral philosophy</a>.<br /><br />As we can see, people don't perceive a failure to save real human children dying right now as genocide; you'll never get anyone to accept that facilitating mass immigration is equivalent to committing genocide. It seems to me whites wouldn't feel obliged to sacrifice for those white people who have not been born yet, even if they believed all your predictions. So your argument can't possibly win people over.<br /><br />Peter says anti-racism still uses a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchstone_(metaphor)" rel="nofollow">touchstone</a> from the last century, and as a result there has been a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_change_(transformation)" rel="nofollow">sea change</a> in anti-racism. So what he's making is a moral case for reform of anti-racism in the cause of fairness. The argument is aimed at people who want to be just.Seannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-59247670584593853562013-05-28T09:00:09.380-04:002013-05-28T09:00:09.380-04:00Just a reminder: there is nothing about the anti-w...Just a reminder: there is nothing about the anti-white program, as revealed for example by the stealth mass immigration initiated under Tony Blair, that does not imply the final elimination of whites everywhere in the world.<br /><br />Any hope that we will get only the "lowball" estimate of the consequences of international anti-white-ism assumes that the anti-whites will be defeated and their program will be decisively interrupted.<br /><br />There is reason to hope for that, because some people do care, and history is full of unexpected turns and horrible projects decisively interrupted.<br /><br />But this is all you can really say for the moderation of the anti-whites: they might not achieve complete white genocide because they might be stopped.<br /><br />As for those who oppose them, we are trying to keep in existence, for instance, the four nations of the British Isles: the English, the Welsh, the Irish and the Scots, white people who have been there with little change (till now!) since the retreat of the glaciers. We would like that story and others like it not to end in genocide in this century or soon after, historically speaking, through mass non-white immigration, forced integration and an array of supplementary anti-white measures.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-89488172313372915452013-05-28T08:34:25.808-04:002013-05-28T08:34:25.808-04:00Sean: "Daybreaker, shooting yourself in the h...Sean: "Daybreaker, shooting yourself in the head, like Saint-Simon did, doesn't prove you are worthless, but it is a sign that you can't face that possibility."<br /><br />Not in this case. Dominique Venner expressed himself clearly. As an individual he was doing well, but his concerns were communal.<br /><br />And they were justified by many facts, and by his analysis of history, an analysis he was qualified to make, though as always different people will have different interpretations.<br /><br /><br />Sean: "The nicest (and most accomplished) whites are often fine with multiculturalism, and totally alienated by nationalist rhetoric. A post aimed at elite whites' concerns isn't helped by extreme comments. It's extraordinarily difficult to get through to elite whites, and the commentators who alienate them."<br /><br />Sean, you've been pushing an idea of dissenters from the anti-white official consensus as "criminal lumpens" and inherently socially unacceptable to "nice" anti-whites. That's inaccurate, since we're talking about people like Dominique Venner, Jason Richwine, Jared Taylor and so on.<br /><br />What I am saying is that the fundamental analysis of white genocide through continuous non-white mass immigration into white countries and forced integration cannot be falsified for the sake of being acceptable to those who take their ideas on what is "nice" from the anti-white tribal moral community of academia or from the mass media.<br /><br />And it doesn't make sense to repudiate people who see this in a radical way and oppose it.<br /><br />This is as useless as if during the Rwandan genocide one had accepted that you can't say black people are doing things like that, so instead (bearing in mind the need not to alienated the most tender-minded elites) we are going to talk only about anti-Tutsi discrimination in housing in career structures. No, that is not the bottom line, and if you start to play along with a rose scented false analysis for the sake of acceptability, there's nothing left to talk about.<br /><br />If your key claims are ethnic nationalist you have to make them, even if "nice people" who are indoctrinated with anti-nationalism are "totally alienated by nationalist rhetoric". If your key claims are racial, you have to make them, even if the anti-white consensus is that it's fine for non-whites to make racial claims but unacceptable for whites to do so. And so on.<br /><br />The key grievances for those who want white people simply to continue in the world without being destroyed as an identifiable group (either in whole or in part, as in the definition of genocide), cannot be softened, they have to be made, and plainly.<br /><br />The requirement of the anti-whites and compromisers that to be respectable enough to get a hearing you must repudiate key figures (like Venner, Taylor and so on) also has to be rejected.<br /><br />If a child is dying because its guardians will not give it food or water, you cannot moderate your demands to say, "OK, no food but only water, and anyone who says a child needs food as well as water and gets upset over it is a bad person." Your compromise is in vain. The child will still die.<br /><br />This is the situation for white children collectively. They are losing their future due to policies that imply a world without white people, or at least a world where some white nations have ceased to exist and others have been gravely harmed as white homelands. A more "moderate" version of the same program won't do.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-74511995106232197312013-05-28T07:48:27.570-04:002013-05-28T07:48:27.570-04:00Under the Board Walk: "Stalinism reformed its...Under the Board Walk: "Stalinism reformed itself when Stalin died. So did Maoism. Antiracism will do the same."<br /><br />There are three problems with that. The first is that you don't suggest a third name. There is no individual whose death would slow down anti-white-ism.<br /><br />Another problem is that anti-white policies of mass immigration and forced integration are rapidly changing the permanent circumstances of whites the worse.<br /><br />After Mao, the Chinese were still there. After Stalin, the Soviet peoples were mostly still there in some fashion, though the breaker of nations did a good job of messing them up.<br /><br />Whites going into a minority in their own countries can't just throw off their shackles.<br /><br />The third problem is that the content of this "moderation" is undefined. Anti-white policies of continuous mass non-white immigration into white countries and forced integration are fundamentally eliminationist. You could "moderate" them by slowing the rate of mass immigration somewhat and putting more emphasis on forcing non-whites as well as whites to get into the melting pot and join a miscellaneous brown future in formerly white countries, and it would still be the end of the whites.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-62361513968748986742013-05-28T06:15:04.232-04:002013-05-28T06:15:04.232-04:00Daybreaker, shooting yourself in the head, like S...Daybreaker, shooting yourself in the head, like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Henri_de_Rouvroy,_comte_de_Saint-Simon#Politics" rel="nofollow">Saint-Simon</a> did, doesn't prove you are worthless, but it is a sign that you can't face that possibility. It was not Saint-Simon shooting himself that caused Marx to take <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Henri_de_Rouvroy,_comte_de_Saint-Simon#Politics" rel="nofollow">Saint-Simon</a>'s ideas and run with them. Moreover, Sontag did not convince elite whites to be anti-racist, she pandered to elite white culture. <br /><br />The nicest (and most accomplished) whites are often fine with multiculturalism, and totally alienated by nationalist rhetoric. A post aimed at elite whites' concerns isn't helped by extreme comments. It's extraordinarily difficult to get through to elite whites, and the commentators who alienate them.Seannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-43680185495246825062013-05-28T04:44:43.254-04:002013-05-28T04:44:43.254-04:00Stalinism reformed itself when Stalin died. So did...Stalinism reformed itself when Stalin died. So did Maoism. Antiracism will do the same.Under the Board Walknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-66770450439257726072013-05-28T04:01:27.016-04:002013-05-28T04:01:27.016-04:00This is what "moderation" in the face of...This is what "moderation" in the face of an extreme situation looks like.<br /><br />”Our ambition is really to do as little as possible,” Stockholm Chief of Police Mats Löfving explained to the Swedish newspaper Expressen on Tuesday.<br /><br />So the police do nothing about the car-burning non-white rioters, but crack down on whites. Just like in the UK, where the brutal murder of a white soldier in the street by non-whites is something for the authorities to smooth over, but if you so much as twitter about it, the police might arrest you at 3:20am if someone says your words were "racist".<br /><br />Such "moderation" is nothing to be proud of or aspire to.<br /><br />It's inconsistent with the continued existence of the white race.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734925856292601239.post-88729467968295715732013-05-28T03:21:28.983-04:002013-05-28T03:21:28.983-04:00Leading, writing, speaking, raising his own family...Leading, writing, speaking, raising his own family, fighting - Dominique Venner had done all these things. Whatever you can say he should have done instead of his final protest against the destruction of the white race, he had done first.<br /><br />He had given us almost everything. And now it's everything.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.com