Inuit
mothers (Wikicommons - Ansgar Walk) - Inuit have low levels of vitamin D. Does this mean
they're not getting enough? Or have their bodies adapted to an environment
where it cannot easily be made in the skin or obtained from the diet?
Inuit
people have "insufficient" vitamin D, even among those who eat a
traditional diet and live a traditional lifestyle. There are consequently moves
afoot to remedy this insufficiency by providing vitamin D supplements. In my
opinion, this is a response to a largely nonexistent problem and will probably
have adverse consequences.
My
arguments are explained in an article I have just published in Inuit Studies. Here is the abstract:
Inuit
have vitamin D blood levels that generally fall within the range of
insufficiency, even when they live on a traditional diet of fish and game meat.
Without this vitamin, bones soften and become deformed, a condition called
rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. Until recent times, however,
this condition was much rarer among Inuit than among non-Inuit, even when the
latter included people living near Inuit communities under similar conditions
of climate and housing. This rarity was attributed to extended breastfeeding
and a high-meat/low-cereal diet. The situation subsequently reversed, with
Inuit becoming more at risk of developing rickets, first in Labrador during the
1920s and later elsewhere. To reduce this excess risk, researchers have
recommended vitamin D supplementation, arguing that breast milk has too little
vitamin D and that even a traditional diet cannot provide the recommended daily
intake. We should ask, however, whether the problem is definitional. Inuit may
have lower levels of vitamin D because they need less, having adapted
culturally and physiologically to an environment where this vitamin is less
easily synthesized in the skin. These adaptations include a diet that enhances
calcium bioavailability (by means of ß-casein in breast milk, certain unknown
substances in meat, and absence of phytic acid), as well as genetic changes
that enable vitamin D to be used more efficiently. Although Inuit are today
more at risk of developing rickets than are non-Inuit, this excess risk is
nonetheless small and seems to have a dietary cause-namely, early weaning and
abandonment of a high-meat/low-cereal diet.
Please
feel free to offer comments or criticisms.
Reference
Frost,
P. (2018). To supplement or not to supplement: are Inuit getting enough vitamin
D? Études Inuit Studies 40(2): 271-291.
1 comment:
The interactions between calcium absorption, food, breast feeding, vitamin D levels and activity are clearly specialised to the Inuits traditional ways. First do no harm would seem to be the relevant consideration when considering blanket supplements. I have seen some things that indicate that extended exclusive breast feeding leads to problems, and yet the pre-chewing of food, let alone raw meat, is not very appealing nowadays.
Post a Comment