Theresa May (Wikicommons) –
“Citizens of nowhere”
The overriding lesson ancient
DNA teaches is that the population in any one place has changed dramatically
many times since the great human post-ice age expansion, and that recognition
of the essentially mongrel nature of humanity should override any notion of
some mystical, longstanding connection between people and place. We are all, to
use Theresa May's derisive label, "citizens of nowhere". (Forbes
2018)
It seems that some pundits are
getting tingles from ancient DNA. Still, there is more to this than political
spin. Greg Cochran is no fan of Theresa May, and yet he too agrees with the
above narrative— as late as 10,000 years ago nobody in Europe looked like the modern
Dutch (Cochran 2018). As he sees it, Europeans were transformed beyond
recognition during the last ten millennia, specifically by two demographic
events:
1. The native hunter-gatherers
of Europe were largely replaced by farmers from Anatolia, i.e., from the Middle
East.
2. There then came another wave
of demographic replacement. Warriors from the Pontic steppe spread out over
Europe, killing the men and taking their women.
What do I think? In my
opinion, there were indeed migrations in European prehistory, and these
migrations led to some populations replacing others to varying degrees. But the
magnitude of replacement has been exaggerated. This is partly due to misreading
of ancient DNA data and partly due to contrary data being ignored. Let me
explain myself.
What did Europeans look like before farming?
First, the modern European
phenotype—pale skin with various hair colors (red, blond, black) and eye colors
(blue, green, brown)—was already in place 10,000 years ago, and probably
several thousand years earlier.
It didn't exist throughout
Europe. Western Europeans had a combination of dark skin, dark hair, and blue
eyes until very late in time. This we know from DNA retrieved at
hunter-gatherer sites in Western Europe: Cheddar Gorge in England (11,000 BP),
Loschbour in Luxembourg (8000 BP), and La Braña in Spain (7000 BP) (Brace et al. 2018; Lazaridis et al. 2014; Olalde et
al. 2014). Dark skin
persisted even after hunting and gathering gave way to farming, as attested by
a Neolithic individual from England, nicknamed 'Sven,' who lived 4,000 to 5,000
years ago: "Sven most likely had intermediate to dark skin pigmentation,
brown eyes and black possibly dark brown hair" (Brace et al. 2018). Sven
lived just before the dawn of European history, being almost a contemporary of
Hammurabi.
We get a different picture,
however, from the ancient DNA of hunter-gatherers in northern and eastern
Europe. There, long before farming, the phenotype was already fully modern. This
has been shown by ancient DNA from Scandinavian and Eastern hunter gatherers:
Norway/Sweden, 9500-6000 BP, 7
individuals: light skin, blue eyes, light brown eyes (Günther et al. 2018)
Sweden (Motala), 8000 BP, 7
individuals: light skin ("predominantly" derived alleles), red hair,
blond hair, blue eyes (Anthrogenica 2015; Mathieson et al. 2015)
East Baltic, 7460-5360 BP, 12
individuals: light skin, blue eyes (Mittnik et al. 2018)
Russia (Karelia), 7500-7000
BP, 1 individual: light skin, dark hair, brown eyes (Eupedia 2015)
Russia (Samara), 7500-7000 BP,
1 individual: light skin, blond hair, blue eyes (Eupedia 2015).
The latest study from Scandinavia
notes the contrast between Scandinavian hunter-gatherers (SHGs) and Western
hunter-gatherers (WHGs):
The genomic data further
allowed us to study the physical appearance of SHGs; for instance, they show a
combination of eye color varying from blue to light brown and light skin
pigmentation. This is strikingly different from the WHGs—who have been
suggested to have the specific combination of blue eyes and dark skin and EHGs—who
have been suggested to be brown-eyed and light-skinned. (Günther et al. 2018)
We have less data on physical
appearance from earlier times. Ancient DNA from Afontova Gora has shown that
people had blond hair in mid-Siberia as early as 18,000 years ago. Using
inferential methods, one research team has estimated that light skin first
appeared 19,000 to 11,000 years ago (Beleza et al., 2013) and another has
estimated 19,200 to 7,600 years ago (Canfield et al., 2014). The modern
European phenotype seems to have taken shape during the last ice age, probably
20,000 to 15,000 years ago within an area stretching from northeast Europe to
mid-Siberia. This new phenotype died out in northern Asia, probably at the
height of the last ice age, and became confined to northeast Europe. It later
spread to the rest of the continent not long before historic times.
Did farmers replace native Europeans?
Doesn't ancient DNA show that
European hunter-gatherers were largely replaced by Middle-Eastern farmers from
Anatolia? That seems to be the accepted wisdom. Ancient DNA shows a lack of
genetic continuity between late hunter-gatherers and early farmers in central
and western Europe. Using mtDNA, Skoglund et al. (2012) estimated Anatolian
admixture at 95% in Sardinians, 52% in northwest Europeans, 31-41% in Swedes,
and 11% in Russians. Not surprisingly, this finding has been cited to show that
Europeans are not even native to their own continent. "We're all citizens
of nowhere."
More surprisingly, this
finding also suggests a strange path of phenotypic evolution: northern
Europeans evolved their current phenotype before the farmers came, then lost it
to some extent, and then regained what they had lost in a short span of time.
When Anatolian farmers moved into that region some 6,000 years ago, the
resulting admixture (30 to 50%) would have greatly reduced the population
frequencies of blue eyes, blond hair, and red hair in the native population. Only
3,000 years remained between that time and the earliest historical records to
allow these population frequencies to bounce back to their former values.
Possible? Only if you assume very strong selection for all of these traits.
Let’s take a closer look.
The case of haplogroup U
If we compare late
hunter-gatherers with present-day Europeans, we see that the main change to
mtDNA has been the loss of haplogroup U. Today, this haplogroup reaches high
levels only among the Saami of Finland and the Mansi of northwestern Siberia,
both of whom were hunter-gatherers until recently (Derbeneva et al 2002).
Most studies show a sharp
break in the frequency of haplogroup U at the time boundary between late
hunter-gatherers and early farmers. Yet, in a study of 92 Danish human remains
from the Mesolithic to the Middle Ages, Melchior et al (2010) found high levels
of haplogroup U as late as the Early Iron Age—long after the advent of farming.
Instead of a sharp break, there was a gradual decline. When Jones et al. (2017)
examined ancient DNA from Latvia and Ukraine, they found a similar persistence
of haplogroup U across the time boundary between hunting-gathering and farming.
The sharp genetic break of
previous studies seems to apply only to central and western Europe, where incoming
farmers advanced rapidly through territory sparsely inhabited by
hunter-gatherers. This wave of advance then stalled, however, from 7500 to 6000
BP, along a line running from the Low Countries in the West to the Black Sea in
the East. North of that line, hunter-gatherers were harder to displace because
they had achieved high population densities through an economy based on
exploitation of marine resources (Price 1991).
In that part of Europe the loss
of haplogroup U is more consistent with slow genetic change through natural
selection. In short, this haplogroup had
given hunter-gatherers some kind of benefit, and they lost that benefit when
they became farmers. Selection then gradually removed the obsolete haplogroup
from the gene pool.
What was the benefit? Different
haplogroups provide different trade-offs between thermogenesis and ATP
synthesis (Balloux et al. 2009). Haplogroup U is associated with reduced sperm
motility, an indication of a shift in energy balance from ATP production to heat
production (Montiel-Sosa et al. 2006). Being nomadic, hunter-gatherers spend more time in the cold,
especially when sleeping in temporary shelters. In contrast, farmers are more
sedentary, sleep in a warmer environment, and have less need to raise body
temperature at the expense of ATP production.
Although the decline in
haplogroup U explains most of the mtDNA gap between hunter-gatherers and
farmers, the two groups still differ genetically in other ways. Are these other
differences a sign of Anatolian admixture? Perhaps. Or perhaps these differences,
too, are caused by adaptation to a new regime of natural selection. No one
really knows, and we should not assume that natural selection cannot be a
causal factor when it clearly can.
Founder effects may be another causal factor. When bands of hunter-gatherers are given the opportunity to
adopt farming, most of them turn up their noses and only a few will make the
change. Because those few bands are not
perfectly representative of the hunter-gatherer gene pool, and because their
numbers may increase many times over (thanks to the increase in food supply)
the resulting founder effects will be substantial.
For all these reasons,
population replacement is inevitably overestimated if it becomes the only
explanation for genetic differences in early Europe between hunter-gatherers
and farmers.
Transition from hunting and gathering to farming in the East Baltic
Lazaridis et al. (2014)
estimated Anatolian farmer admixture in East Baltic peoples at 30%. This is
less than the figure of 52% claimed for northwest Europeans, but it is still
substantial. So a measurable signal of admixture should appear when late
hunter-gatherers are compared with early farmers in the East Baltic. This
comparison has been done by two research teams, and both failed to find any
signal of Anatolian admixture. Jones et al. (2017) noted this absence in their
study of ancient DNA from Latvia:
It is striking that we did not
find evidence for early European or Anatolian farmer admixture in any of our
Latvian Neolithic samples [...]. This lack of admixture is also supported by
the mitochondrial haplogroup of the Latvian Neolithic samples (all belong to U;
Figure 1), which is prevalent in European hunter-gatherers, including our
Latvian Mesolithic samples, but not in early farmers.
[...] The emergence of
Neolithic features in the absence of immigration by Anatolian farmers
highlights the roles of horizontal cultural transmission and potentially
independent innovation during the Neolithic transition. (Jones et al. 2017)
The first evidence of
Anatolian admixture in the East Baltic appears much later, in the Bronze Age
(Jones et al. 2017).
Mittnik et al. (2018)
similarly found no evidence of such admixture during the transition to farming
in the East Baltic. They ascribed the Anatolian admixture in present-day DNA to
limited gene flow after the Bronze Age. They also found, however, that some of
this “admixture” was already present in the earlier hunter-gatherers:
One Narva individual,
Spiginas1, dated to ca. 4440-4240 calBCE, belongs to a mitochondrial haplogroup
of the H branch, normally associated with the Neolithic expansion into Europe,
but shows no evidence of Neolithic farmer ancestry on the nuclear level
suggesting that this haplogroup might have been present already in foraging
groups. (Mittnik et al. 2018)
It seems that some aspects of
the Anatolian genetic profile were already shared with Scandinavian/Baltic
hunter-gatherers. How did this come about? Perhaps there was trade between
farmers and SHGs, including human merchandise—much like
the later trade in Slavic women with the Middle East. Or perhaps the Anatolian
farmers shared common ancestry with some hunter-gatherer groups (SHGs and EHGs)
but not with others (WHGs). Perhaps these farmers had originated in an earlier
southward expansion of the same hunter-gatherer groups toward the Black Sea and
into Anatolia.
What about the Indo-European expansion?
In northern Europe, ancient
DNA does show a demographic expansion by a Pontic steppe people called the
Yamna culture (commonly identified with proto-Indo-Europeans). This expansion
should have strongly impacted the people of Latvia and Ukraine, who indeed show
signs of Yamna admixture. Even there, however, there is more continuity than
rupture between hunter-gatherer and farmer samples (Jones et al. 2017).
Again, the same objection applies
here as it does to Anatolian farmer admixture. Any estimate of Yamna admixture
will tend to be an over-estimate because it is difficult if not impossible to
exclude genetic differences due to other causes, notably adaptation to a new
regime of natural selection, as well as founder effects.
Whenever I raise this
objection, the usual reply is that the length of time between late
hunter-gatherers and early farmers is too short for significant change by any
causal factor except admixture from an outside source. This is untrue in the
case of founder effects. It is also untrue in the case of a change in natural
selection, which can produce significant effects over any time interval longer
than ten generations.
One might object that founder
effects can be ignored because they are random, i.e., they cannot produce the
sort of directional genetic change that is caused by admixture from an outside
source. Unfortunately, some of this random change will point in the
"right" direction and be thus misattributed to admixture. The
likelihood of this error increases if one is looking for admixture from two
possible sources, i.e., Anatolian farmers and Yamna pastoralists.
Conclusion
Farming began some 10,000
years ago in the Middle East and entered Europe from the southeast. As farming
advanced farther and farther into Europe, the farmers at the "front"
became less and less Anatolian through intermixture with native
hunter-gatherers. This was especially so during the long period (7500-6000 BP)
when the wave of advance stalled along a line running from the Low Countries to
the Black Sea. The last push, particularly into the East Baltic and Ukraine,
was much more a cultural change than a genetic one.
Indeed, estimates of Anatolian
admixture seem to be inflated across all of northern Europe. It is often stated
that population replacement must have happened because we see a sharp genetic
break at the time boundary between late hunter-gatherers and early farmers. Yet
the break seems to apply only to central and western Europe, where there was
indeed a fairly rapid replacement of hunter-gatherers by incoming farmers. Ancient
DNA from Denmark and the East Baltic shows no sharp break (Jones et al. 2017; Melchior
et al. 2010; Mittnik et al. 2018).
Some of the confusion in this
debate may arise from the assumption that "late hunter-gatherers"
formed a single group in Europe. In fact, there were at least three such groups
(WHGs, SHGs, EHGs), whose genetic profiles significantly differed from each
other and whose fates were likewise different. WHGs were an evolutionary dead
end. They were replaced. The same cannot be said for the
hunter-fisher-gatherers of Scandinavia and the Baltic, who were able to achieve
high population densities by exploiting marine resources (Price 1991). With
them we see more genetic continuity than rupture, and it is possible that some
genetic characteristics formerly ascribed solely to "Anatolian"
farmers were in fact of SHG origin.
As for the Yamna expansion, it
does seem to be a real genetic event, although even here we find more
continuity than rupture. Again, estimates of admixture will tend to be
overestimates because of concurrent genetic change due to natural selection and
founder effects.
References
Anthrogenica. 2015. Surprising
pale pigmentation in Mesolithic Motala HGs. March 7
http://www.anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?3975-Surprising-Pale-pigmentation-in-Mesolithic-Motala-HGs
Balloux F., L.J. Handley, T.
Jombart, H. Liu, and A. Manica (2009). Climate shaped the worldwide
distribution of human mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Biological Sciences 276 (1672): 3447-55.
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/276/1672/3447.short
Beleza, S., Murias dos Santos,
A., McEvoy, B., Alves, I., Martinho, C., Cameron, E., Shriver, M.D., Parra
E.J., & Rocha, J. (2013). The timing of pigmentation lightening in
Europeans. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 30: 24-35.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/72f9/1aab88ba39bc1098f7e4d0ca40806a67d665.pdf
Brace, S., Y. Diekmann, T.J.
Booth, Z. Faltyskova, N. Rohland, S. Mallick, et al. (2018). Population
replacement in early Neolithic Britain, BioRxiv, February 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/267443
Canfield, V.A., Berg, A.,
Peckins, S., Wentzel, S.M., Ang, K.C., Oppenheimer, S., & Cheng, K.C.
(2014). Molecular phylogeography of a human autosomal skin color locus under
natural selection, G3 3: 2059-2067.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khai_Ang/publication/256764518_Molecular_Phylogeography_of_a_Human_Autosomal_Skin_Color_Locus_Under_Natural_Selection/links/00b495359252cec717000000.pdf
Cochran, G. (2018). Who We
Are: #2 Purity of Essence, West Hunter,
March 29
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/who-we-are-2-purity-of-essence/
Derbeneva, O.A., E.B.
Starikovskaya, D.C. Wallace, & R.I. Sukernik. (2002). Traces of early
Eurasians in the Mansi of Northwest Siberia revealed by mitochondrial DNA
analysis, American Journal of Human
Genetics 70:1009-1014.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707603085
Forbes, P. (2018). Who We Are
and How We Got Here by David Reich review - new findings from ancient DNA, The Guardian, March 29
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/mar/29/who-we-are-how-got-here-david-reich-ancient-dna-review
Günther, T., H. Malmström,
E.M. Svensson, A. Omrak, F. Sánchez-Quinto, G.M. Kilinç, et al. (2018).
Population genomics of Mesolithic Scandinavia: Investigating early postglacial
migration routes and high-latitude adaptation. PLoS Biol 16(1): e2003703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003703
Jones, E.R., G. Zarina, V.
Moiseyev, E. Lightfoot, P.R. Nigst, A. Manica, et al. (2017). The Neolithic
Transition in the Baltic Was Not Driven by Admixture with Early European
Farmers, Current Biology 27(4):
576-582.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982216315421
Lazaridis, I., N. Patterson,
A. Mittnik, G. Renaud, S. Mallick, K. Kirsanow, et al. (2014). Ancient human
genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans, Nature 513(7518): 409-413
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170574/
Mathieson, I, I. Lazaradis, N.
Rohland, S. Mallick, N. Patterson, S. Alpaslan, et al. (2015). Genome-wide
patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians, Nature 528(7583): 499-503
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918750/
Mathieson, I., S.A.
Roodenberg, C. Posth, A. Szécsényi-Nagy, N. Rohland, S. Mallick, et al. 2018.
The Genomic History of Southeastern Europe, Supplementary Information, p. 52, Nature, February 21 online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25778
Melchior, L., N. Lynnerup,
H.R. Siegismund, T. Kivisild, J. Dissing. (2010). Genetic diversity among
ancient Nordic populations, PLoS ONE
5(7): e11898
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0011898
Mittnik, A., C-C. Wang, S.
Pfrengle, M. Daubaras, G. Zarina, F. Hallgren, et al. (2018). The genetic
prehistory of the Baltic Sea region, Nature
Communications 9(442)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-02825-9
Montiel-Sosa, F., Ruiz-Pesini,
E., Enriquez, J. A., Marcuello, A., Diez-Sanchez, C., Montoya, J., Wallace, D.
J. & López-Pérez, M. J. (2006). Differences of sperm motility in
mitochondrial DNA haplogroup U sublineages. Gene 368: 21-27. (doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.09.015)
Olalde, I., M.E. Allentoft, F.
Sanchez-Quinto, G. Santpere, C.W.K. Chiang, M. DeGiorgio, et al. (2014).
Derived immune and ancestral pigmentation alleles in a 7,000-year-old
Mesolithic European. Nature 507
(7491):225-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12960
Price, T.D. (1991). The
Mesolithic of Northern Europe, Annual
Review of Anthropology 20:211-233.
http://www.cas.umt.edu/departments/anthropology/courses/anth254/documents/annurev.an.TDouglasPrice1991MseolithicNEurope.pdf
Reich, D. (2018). Who We Are and How We Got There. Ancient DNA
and the New Science of the Human Past. Pantheon Books
https://books.google.ca/books?id=a4gqDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=fr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Skoglund, P., H. Malmström, M.
Raghavan, J. Storå, P. Hall, E.
Willerslev, M.T. Gilbert, A. Götherström, and M. Jakobsson. (2012). Origins and
genetic legacy of Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe, Science 336:466-469.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.9827&rep=rep1&type=pdf
