Estonian
schoolchildren (Wikicommons). Estonian children have smaller brains if raised
by a biological parent and a step-parent. Therefore, two committed parents are
better than one, right? Well, not in this case. Brains aren't smaller in
Estonian children raised by a single parent (and no step-parent).
In
Estonia, cranial volume was one of several anthropometric traits that were
routinely measured in schoolchildren during the Soviet era. The data didn't
suffer from volunteer bias because the measurements were mandatory. Mortality
bias was minimal because the subjects were young. This data source is thus
better in many respects than data from Western biobanks. It is now being mined
by Peeter Hõrak, a University of Tartu professor, to learn more about nature
and nurture in human brain development.
I
discussed this data source in a previous post (Frost 2020). One problem is that
the study population is not as homogeneous as it may seem. In fact, 16% of the
fathers and 7% of the fathers were not Estonian (Hõrak 2020). This factor might
explain some differences in the data, especially changes over time.
The latest study
This
data source has now been used to see whether the brain size of children is
influenced by family structure, specifically whether the child was raised by biological
parents or by step-parents. The data came from 822 children born between 1980
and 1987 in Tartu, Estonia and were measured at around 14 years of age.
The
children had significantly larger brains when the household had both biological
parents:
Cranial volume was related to family structure and paternal education. Children living with both birth-parents had larger heads than those living in families containing a step-parent. [...] our findings suggest that families including both genetic parents provide non-material benefits that stimulate predominantly cranial growth. (Lauringson et al. 2020)
That's
what we read in the Abstract. The brain was bigger on average in children who
had been raised by both biological parents, rather than by a biological parent
and a step-parent, presumably because a step-parent contributes less to the
child's upbringing.
That
finding is rejected, however, in the Results section. It turns out that there
was no difference in brain size between children raised by both biological
parents and children raised by a single parent (in almost all cases the
biological mother). The brain was smaller only in children raised by a
biological parent and a step-parent:
At the same time, cranial volumes of children living with a single parent were similar to those living with two providers, even though the former reported on average lower resource availability and more frequent meat shortage. Associations between family type and cranial volume thus cannot be explained on the basis of dilution of material resources. (Lauringson et al. 2020)
Differences
in family structure also failed to correlate with differences in the child's
height. If life in a stepfamily had somehow harmed the child's development,
that harm was much less observable in overall body growth than in cranial
volume.
So
what's going on here? Keep in mind two things about Estonian society of the
late 20th century:
-
A single parent was almost always a woman, often a widow who refused to
remarry, either because she still felt attached to her deceased spouse or
because she considered the potential husbands available to be more trouble than
they were worth.
-
A step-parent could be of either sex. A stepfather often took over from a man
who had sired the child out of wedlock or during a short-lived marriage.
Thus,
on average, the biological father was a different kind of man in the two
situations. In the first situation, he was usually the sort of man who would
remain with the mother of his child until his death. In the second, he was often
the sort of man who would leave the mother of his child once a more interesting
woman came into view. One may presume there are differences in genetic quality
between the two kinds of men. This hypothesis is actually advanced in the
study:
An alternative (yet not mutually exclusive) explanation to the observed associations between family type and cranial volume of children would be that parents prone to remarrying possess on average (genetically) smaller heads than those prone to avoiding divorce or remaining single after divorcing. Such a scenario would assume robust genetic correlations between cranial volume and personality traits related to marriage stability. Twin studies have shown that genetic factors account for 13-53% of the variation in divorce [...], and if personality traits associated with a propensity to divorce are genetically correlated with cranial volume or its growth rate, one would detect smaller heads of children growing up in divorced/separated families. Such an explanation would be consistent with the predictions of life history theory, assuming that qualities characteristic of slow pace of life-including high somatic investment into body and brain growth and propensity for relatively low mating effort (in relation to parenting effort)-have coevolved (and cluster) with higher mental abilities and conscientious and risk-averse personality traits [...]. Consistent with this view are also the findings in our sample where fathers with only primary education were shorter and more prone to divorce/separate than others. (Lauringson et al. 2020)
We
see a similar problem of interpretation with the relationship between father
absence and early sexual maturity in daughters. Using a large sample of 1,247
daughters, Surbey (1990) found that daughters with an absent father matured
four to five months earlier than those who lived with both parents continuously
and seven months earlier than those with an absent mother. Surbey argued that
the presence of a strange male accelerates the speed of sexual maturation. In
other words, at a subconscious level, the girl does not recognize the man as a
father. She recognizes him as a potential mate, and her body gears up for
procreation.
This
hypothesis was challenged by Mendle et al. (2006) who examined the daughters of
twin mothers.
In a pair of twin mothers of which only one raises her children with a stepfather, the offspring of both twins are equally likely to display early age of menarche. It therefore appears that some genetic or shared environmental confound accounts for the earlier association found in female children living with stepfathers.
It
seems, then, that people who end up as step-parents are, on average,
genetically different from other parents. They tend to have the mental and
behavioral characteristics of a "fast" life history.
References
Frost, P. (2020). Declining intelligence in the 20th century: the case of Estonia. Evo and Proud, August 3 http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/08/declining-intelligence-in-20th-century.html
Hõrak,
P. (2020). Personal communication.
Lauringson,
V., G. Veldre, and P. Hõrak. (2020). Adolescent Cranial Volume as a Sensitive
Marker of Parental Investment: The Role of Non-material Resources? Frontiers in Psychology 15 December https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602401
Surbey,
M.K. (1990). Family composition, stress, and the timing of human menarche. In
T.E. Ziegler & F.B. Bercovitch (eds.) Socioendocrinology
of Primate Reproduction, pp. 11-32, New York: Wiley-Liss Inc.