Genetic data suggest that ancestral East Asians
diverged from ancestral Europeans long after the African/non-African split
(source). This timeline, however, seems to be challenged by archaic DNA that is
reputed to be 40,000 years old.
When did the ancestors of Europeans and East Asians
part company? In my opinion, the divergence must have happened long after the
time (c. 50,000 BP) when modern humans began to spread out of Africa. It
probably occurred near the onset of the last ice age (25,000 – 10,000 BP), when
advancing ice sheets and glacial lakes restricted gene flow between the western
and eastern ends of Eurasia (Rogers, 1986).
This timeline is supported by several pieces of
evidence:
1. Human skin began to lighten some 30,000 years ago
in a population that was ancestral to both Europeans and East Asians (Beleza et
al., 2012). A second phase of skin lightening, which affected only Europeans,
occurred between 19,000 and 13,000 years ago. Proto-Eurasians must have
therefore begun to diverge into two groups somewhere between 30,000 BP and
19,000 BP.
2. A Y-chromosome study suggests that all North
Eurasian peoples descend from a common ancestral population dated to about
15,000 BP (Stepanov & Puzyrev, 2000; see also Armour et al., 1996; Santos
et al., 1999; Zerjal et al., 1997).
3. The language families of northern Eurasia,
particularly Uralic and Yukaghir and more generally Uralic-Yukaghir,
Eskimo-Aleut, Chukotko-Kamchatkan and Altaic, share deep structural affinities
that point to a common origin and not simply to word borrowing (Cavalli-Sforza,
1994, pp. 97-99; Fortescue, 1998; Rogers, 1986).
4. Archeological evidence (characteristic lithic
technology, grave goods with red ocher, and sites with small shallow basins)
shows the presence of a common cultural tradition throughout Europe and Siberia
20,000 to 15,000 years ago (Goebel, 1999; Haynes, 1980; Haynes, 1982).
5. Dental and cranial remains from Mal’ta
(23,000-20,000 BP) in southern Siberia indicate strong affinities with Upper
Paleolithic Europeans (Alexeyev & Gokhman, 1994; Goebel, 1999).
Back to the
drawing board?
Nonetheless, this timeline now seems disproved by a
recent study of archaic DNA:
We have extracted DNA from a
40,000-y-old anatomically modern human from Tianyuan Cave outside Beijing,
China. […] The nuclear DNA sequences determined from this early modern human
reveal that the Tianyuan individual derived from a population that was
ancestral to many present-day Asians and Native Americans but postdated the divergence
of Asians from Europeans. (Fu et al., 2013)
So ancestral Europeans and East Asians had already
begun to diverge from each other by 40,000 BP. Considering that modern humans
entered the Middle East around 46-47,000 BP, the time of divergence must have
been close to the initial split between Africans and non-Africans (Schwarcz et
al., 1979). Yet the genetic data argue otherwise.
When a new finding seems inconsistent with other
data, one should take a second look. Do those human remains from Tianyuan Cave
really date back to 40,000 years ago? Actually, they were initially dated to
25,000 BP, by means of uranium series dating of deer teeth from the same cave
layer (Tong et al., 2004). Because this dating method is considered problematic
when applied to organic remains, radiocarbon dating was later used to get a
firmer date, which turned out to be 39,000 – 42,000 BP (Shang et al., 2007).
The two dating methods differed by 15,000 years.
That’s a big discrepancy, and it may be why Shang et al. (2007) repeated their
radiocarbon dating on several organic remains from the same layer. Such an
approach, however, doesn’t rule out the possibility of a shared source of
error, either in the remains themselves or in the testing laboratory.
There are two other reasons for doubting the
estimate of 40,000 BP:
Associated
faunal remains
The modern human remains from layer III were
associated with the remains of other fauna. In general, the faunal assemblage
indicates a significantly colder climate than the one that now prevails around
Beijing. On the one hand, layer III had remains of the Siberian musk deer (Moschus moschiferus), which now lives
farther north in the taiga of southern Siberia and northern Manchuria. On the
other hand, layer III had no remains of warm climate species, i.e., the rhesus
macaque (Macaca mulatta) and the
masked palm civet (Paguma larvata),
even though these species were present in the uppermost Holocene layer (Shang
et al., 2007). The faunal evidence is thus consistent with the colder climate
that existed when the last ice age began 25,000 years ago. It is not consistent
with the warmer climate that prevailed 40,000 years ago in southern Siberia and
northern China during the Malokheta Interstade of the Karga Interglacial
(33,000 - 43,000 BP). At that time, average annual temperatures were as much as
2-3° C warmer than they are today (Goebel, 2004).
An outlier among
finds of early East Asians
With a dating of 40,000 BP, these remains are much
older than all other known finds that might be ancestral to present-day East
Asians. The oldest rivals to Tianyuan Cave are Yamashita-cho, Okinawa (≈32,000
BP), Zhoukoudian Upper Cave, China (24,000 – 29,000 BP), Pinza-Abu, Okinawa ( ≈26,000
BP), and Minatogawa, Okinawa (≈18,000 BP) (Shang et al., 2007).
Conclusion
Archaic DNA promises to revolutionize our
understanding of human origins. Unfortunately, it may also confer an aura of
false certainty on new findings, thereby discouraging the healthy skepticism
that makes good science possible. The Tianyuan Cave remains are undoubtedly
those of an early East Asian and thus promise to shed much light on the
beginnings of this branch of humanity. There are, however, reasons for doubting
the date of 40,000 BP, and such doubts will probably become more insistent as
we retrieve archaic DNA from other East Asian remains.
References
Alexeyev, V.P., & I.I. Gokhman. (1994). Skeletal
remains of infants from a burial on the Mal'ta Upper Paleolithic site, Homo, 45, 119‑126.
Armour, J.A.L., T. Anttinen, C.A. May, E.E. Vega, A.
Sajantila, J.R. Kidd, K.K. Kidd, J. Bertranpetit, S. Paabo, A.J. & Jeffreys.
(1996). Minisatellite diversity supports a recent African origin for modern
humans, Nature Genetics, 13, 154‑160.
Beleza, S., A. Múrias dos Santos, B. McEvoy, I. Alves,
C. Martinho, E. Cameron, M.D. Shriver, E.J. Parra, & J. Rocha. (2012).
The timing of pigmentation lightening in Europeans, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20, online
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., P. Menozzi, & A. Piazza.
(1994). The History and Geography of
Human Genes, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fortescue, M.D. (1998). Language Relations across Bering Strait. Reappraising the
Archaeological and Linguistic Evidence, Cassell: London.
Fu, Q., M. Meyer, X. Gao, U. Stenzel, H. A. Burbano,
J. Kelso, & S. Pääbo. (2013). DNA analysis of an early modern human from
Tianyuan Cave, China, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., published ahead of print January 22,
2013, doi:10.1073/pnas.1221359110
http://intl.pnas.org/content/early/2013/01/17/1221359110.abstract
Goebel, T. (2004) “The early Upper Paleolithic of
Siberia” (pp. 162-195) in S.L. Kuhn, K.W. Kerry (eds). The Early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe, University of
California Press.
Goebel, T. (1999). Pleistocene human colonization of
Siberia and peopling of the Americas: An ecological approach, Evolutionary Anthropology, 8, 208‑227.
Haynes, C.V. (1982). Were Clovis progenitors in
Beringia? In D.M. Hopkins (ed). Paleoecology
of Beringia, New York: Academic Press, pp. 383‑398.
Haynes, C.V. (1980). The Clovis culture, Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 1, 115‑121.
Rogers, R.A. (1986). Language, human subspeciation,
and Ice Age barriers in Northern Siberia, Canadian
Journal of Anthropology, 5, 11‑22.
Santos, F.R., A. Pandya, C. Tyler‑Smith, S.D.J. Pena,
M. Schanfield, W.R. Leonard, L. Osipova, M.H. Crawford, & R.J. Mitchell.
(1999). The Central Siberian origin for Native American Y chromosomes, American Journal of Human Genetics, 64, 619‑628.
Schwarcz, H.P., B. Blackwell, P. Goldberg, &
A.E. Marks. (1979). Uranium series dating of travertine from archaeological
sites, Nahal Zin, Israel, Nature, 277, 558-560.
Shang, H., H. Tong, S. Zhang, F. Chen, & E.
Trinkaus. (2007). An early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, Zhoukoudian, China,
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences U.S.A., 104, 6573-6578.
http://www.pnas.org/content/104/16/6573.full
Stepanov, V.A., & V.P. Puzyrev. (2000).
Evolution of Y‑chromosome haplotypes in populations of North Eurasia, American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 220.
Tong, H., H. Shang, S. Zhang, & F. Chen. (2004).
A preliminary report on the newly found Tianyuan Cave, a Late Pleistocene human
fossil site near Zhoukoudian, Chinese
Science Bulletin, 49, 853-857.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02889760?LI=true
Zerjal, T., B. Dashnyam, A. Pandya, M. Kayser, L.
Roewer, F.R. Santos, W. Scheifenhövel, N. Fretwell, M.A. Jobling, S. Harihara, K.
Shimizu, D. Semjidmaa, A. Sajantila, P. Salo, M.H. Crawford, E.K. Ginter, O.V.
Evgrafov, & C. Tyler‑Smith. (1997). Genetic relationships of Asians and
Northern Europeans, revealed by Y‑chromosomal DNA analysis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 1174‑1183.